![]() Having very good dispersion and using the same formula as Stalingrad but having 2.05 sigma instead of 2.65 makes up for the longer reload. Where the Carnot feels like more of a combination between the Henri IV and Agir. The island hugging gameplay you can find in the Salem, Des Moines, Worcester (any cruiser with curvy balistics). It may look that the Tulsa is just a tier IX Des Moines but it lacks some things like the 30mm middle section, the 10km radar, has a little bit longer reload with less guns. In my opinion I would recommend the Carnot as it presents more unique and fun gameplay compared to the Tulsa. She can run down any cruiser, can farm BBs from range comfortably, and is decent vs DDs coz you do have 10 HE shells spewing out at em, even tho those HE shells are not that good.Īlso, Free XP ships are not a thing anymore. Hella fast, quite tankier than she might appear at first, the guns are worse than something like Agir or Alaska, but she does have an extra gun, and the guns themselves are not that bad. Its also going to be a good captain trainer.Ĭarnot is the latest dude in the super cruiser family. When T9 ranked or clan battles come I imagine this thing is going to be disgusting. Tulsa is a rather balanced ship in randoms. Okay, last note, any news about possible new FXP ships, Sherman or Sevastopol maybe? As usual, I'm only asking for the opinion of ship owners that have hands-on experience in them. ![]() I don't need the educational information because i have already read and watched about these ships. On a serious note.nah! There is nothing serious, it's just a question Carnot and/or Tulsa owners how you like your ships and which would you choose over the other?ĭisclaimer: I am not asking about the technical details of the ships or their play styles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |